[2024] Free 300-410 Exam Dumps to Pass Exam Easily 300-410 Exam Dumps, 300-410 Practice Test Questions The Cisco 300-410 exam focuses on a range of topics related to enterprise networking, including advanced routing protocols, advanced services, IP multicast, VPNs, and network infrastructure security. Candidates must have a strong understanding of these topics in order to pass the exam and earn the [...]

[2024] Free 300-410 Exam Dumps to Pass Exam Easily [Q135-Q152]

Share

[2024] Free 300-410 Exam Dumps to Pass Exam Easily

300-410 Exam Dumps, 300-410 Practice Test Questions


The Cisco 300-410 exam focuses on a range of topics related to enterprise networking, including advanced routing protocols, advanced services, IP multicast, VPNs, and network infrastructure security. Candidates must have a strong understanding of these topics in order to pass the exam and earn the Cisco Certified Specialist - Enterprise Advanced Infrastructure Implementation certification.


Cisco 300-410 exam is a challenging test that covers a wide range of topics, including advanced routing protocols, VPN technologies, BGP, OSPF, and EIGRP. It also evaluates a candidate's knowledge of network services such as NAT, QoS, and multicast. Additionally, the exam assesses a candidate's ability to implement security features such as AAA, IPSec, and VPN. To succeed in the certification, candidates must have a deep understanding of networking concepts, protocols, and technologies, as well as practical experience in configuring and managing enterprise networks.

 

NEW QUESTION # 135
Refer to the exhibit.

Why is the remote NetFlow server failing to receive the NetFlow data?

  • A. The flow monitor is applied in the wrong direction.
  • B. The flow monitor is applied to the wrong interface.
  • C. The flow exporter is configured but is not used.
  • D. The destination of the flow exporter is not reachable.

Answer: C


NEW QUESTION # 136

Refer to the exhibit. An engineer configured SNMP traps to record spoofed packets drop of more than 48000 a minute on the ethernet0/0 interlace. During an IP spoofing attack, the engineer noticed that no notifications have been received by the SNMP server. Which configuration resolves the issue on R1?

  • A. ip verify unicast notification threshold 800
  • B. ip verify unicast notification threshold 80
  • C. ip verify unicast notification threshold 8000
  • D. ip verity unicast notification threshold 48000

Answer: A


NEW QUESTION # 137
Refer to the exhibit.

R2 can access content on the server successfully.
A network engineer finds packet drops on PC1 for traffic destined to network 2.2.2.2/32.
Which action resolves the issue?

  • A. Add the eigrp stub connected static command.
  • B. Redistribute the static metric in EIGRP.
  • C. Remove the eigrp stub connected command.
  • D. Redistribute the connected metric in EIGRP.

Answer: A


NEW QUESTION # 138
Which two solutions are used to overcome a flapping link that causes a frequent label binding exchange between MPLS routers? (Choose two)

  • A. Create link dampening on links to protect the session.
  • B. Create targeted hellos to protect the session.
  • C. Increase a session delay to protect the session.
  • D. Increase a hold-timer to protect the session.
  • E. Increase input queue on links to protect the session.

Answer: A,B

Explanation:
Explanation
To avoid having to rebuild the LDP session altogether, you can protect it. When the LDP session between two directly connected LSRs is protected, a targeted LDP session is built between the two LSRs. When the directly connected link does go down between the two LSRs, the targeted LDP session is kept up as long as an alternative path exists between the two LSRs.
For the protection to work, you need to enable it on both the LSRs. If this is not possible, you can enable it on one LSR, and the other LSR can accept the targeted LDP Hellos by configuring the command mpls ldp discovery targeted-hello accept.
Reference: https://www.ccexpert.us/mpls-network/mpls-ldp-session-protection.html Or from the reference at https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/us/docs/2019/pdf/5eU6DfQV/TECMPL-3201.pdf Troubleshooting LDP Issues Problem:
I. When a link flaps (for a short time),
...
Solution:
+ When LDP session supported by link hello is setup, create a targeted hello to protect the session.


NEW QUESTION # 139
R2 has a locally originated prefix 192.168.130.0/24 and has these configurations:

What is the result when the route-map OUT command is applied toward an eBGP neighbor R1 (1.1.1.1) by using the neighbor 1.1.1.1 route-map OUT out command?

  • A. R1 sees 192.168.130.0/24 as two AS hops away instead of one AS hop away.
  • B. Network 192.168.130.0/24 is not allowed in the R1 table
  • C. R1 does not accept any routes other than 192.168.130.0/24
  • D. R1 does not forward traffic that is destined for 192.168.30.0/24

Answer: A


NEW QUESTION # 140
Refer to the exhibit.

A company with autonomous system number AS65401 has obtained IP address block 209.165.200.224/27 fro, ARIN. The company needed more IP addresses and was assigned block 209.165.202.128/27 from ISP2. An engineer is ISP1 reports they are receiving ISP2 routes from AS65401. Which configuration onR1 resolves the issue?

  • A.
  • B.
  • C.
  • D.

Answer: D

Explanation:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/23675-27.html


NEW QUESTION # 141
Refer to the exhibit.

An engineer configures two ASBRs 10 4 17.6 and 10 4 15 5 in an OSPF network to redistribute routes from EIGRP However, both ASBRs show the EIGRP routes as equal costs even though the next-hop router 10 4 17 6 is closer to R1 How should the network traffic to the EIGRP prefixes be sent via 10 4.17.6?

  • A. The administrative distance should be raised to 120 from the ASBR 104.17.6
  • B. The ASBR 10 4 17 6 should assign a tag to match and assign a lower metnc on R1
  • C. The administrative distance should be raised to 120 from the ASBR 10.4.15 5.
  • D. The redistributed prefixes should be advertised as Type 1

Answer: D


NEW QUESTION # 142
Refer to the exhibit.

R1 is connected with R2 via GigabitEthernet0/0, and R2 cannot ping R1. What action will fix the issue?

  • A. Fix route dampening configured on the router.
  • B. Fix IP Event Dampening configured on the interface.
  • C. Replace the SFP module because it is not supported.
  • D. Correct the IP SLA probe that failed.

Answer: B

Explanation:


NEW QUESTION # 143

Refer to the exhibit. R1 and R2 cannot establish an EIGRP adjacency. Which action establishes EIGRP adjacency?

  • A. Remove the passive-interface command from the R2 configuration so that it matches the R1 configuration.
  • B. Remove the current autonomous system number on one of the routers and change to a different value.
  • C. Add the no auto-summary command to the R2 configuration so that it matches the R1 configuration.
  • D. Add the passive-interface command to the R1 configuration so that it matches the R2 configuration.

Answer: A


NEW QUESTION # 144
An engineer is implementing a coordinated change with a server team. As part of the change, the engineer must configure interlace GigabitEthernet2 in an existing VRF "RED" then move the interface to an existing VRF "BLUE" when the server team is ready. The engineer configured interface GigabitEthemet2 in VRF "RED"

Which configuration completes the change?

  • A. interface GigabitEthernet2
    no ip address
    vrf forwarding BLUE
  • B. interface GigabitEthernet2
    no vrf forwarding RED
    vrf forwarding BLUE
  • C. interface GigabitEthernet2
    no vrf forwarding RED
    vrf forwarding BLUE
    ip address 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.254
  • D. interface GigabitEthernet2
    no ip address
    ip address 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.254
    vrf forwarding BLUE

Answer: C

Explanation:
When assigning an interface to a VRF, the IP address will be removed so we have to reassign the IP address to that interface.


NEW QUESTION # 145
Refer to the exhibit.

An engineer configures two ASBRs 10 4 17.6 and 10 4 15 5 in an OSPF network to redistribute routes from EIGRP However, both ASBRs show the EIGRP routes as equal costs even though the next-hop router 10 4 17 6 is closer to R1.
How should the network traffic to the EIGRP prefixes be sent via 10 4.17.6?

  • A. The ASBR 10 4 17 6 should assign a tag to match and assign a tower metnc on R1
  • B. The administrative distance should be raised to 120 from the ASBR 104 17 6
  • C. The administrator distance should be raised to 120 from the ASBR 104 15.5.
  • D. The redistributed prefixes should be advertised as Type 1.

Answer: D


NEW QUESTION # 146
Drag and drop the IPv6 first hop security device roles from the left onto the corresponding descriptions on the right.

Answer:

Explanation:

Explanation
Graphical user interface, text, application, email Description automatically generated

Reference:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus9000/sw/7-x/security/configuration/guide/b_Ci


NEW QUESTION # 147
Refer to the exhibit.

AAA server 10.1.1.1 is configured with the default authentication and accounting settings, but the switch cannot communicate with the server Which action resolves this issue?

  • A. Correct the timeout value.
  • B. Match the authentication port
  • C. Match the accounting port
  • D. Correct the shared secret.

Answer: B

Explanation:
Command Default
Accounting port: 1813
Authentication port: 1812
Accounting: enabled
Authentication: enabled
Retransmission count: 1
Idle-time: 0
Server monitoring: disabled
Timeout: 5 seconds
Test username: test
Test password: test
Reference:
https://www.cisco.com/c/m/en_us/techdoc/dc/reference/cli/n5k/commands/radius-server-host.html By default, RADIUS uses UDP port 1812 for authentication and port 1813 for accounting. In the exhibit above we see port 1814 is being used for authentication to AAA server at 10.1.1.1 which is not the default port so we must adjust the authentication port to the default value 1812.


NEW QUESTION # 148

Refer to the exhibit. An engineer receives this error message when trying to access another router in-band from the serial interface connected to the console of R1.
Which configuration is needed on R1 to resolve this issue?

  • A. R1(config)#line vty 0
    R1(config-line)# transport output ssh
  • B. R1(config)#line vty 0
    R1(config-line)# transport output ssh
    R1(config-line)# transport preferred ssh
  • C. R1(config)#line console 0
    R1(config-line)# transport output ssh
  • D. R1(config)#line console 0
    R1(config-line)# transport preferred ssh

Answer: B

Explanation:
Section: Mixed Questions


NEW QUESTION # 149
An engineer configured the wrong default gateway for the Cisco DNA Center enterprise interface during the install. Which command must the engineer run to correct the configuration?

  • A. sudo maglev-config update
  • B. sudo update config install
  • C. sudo maglev reinstall
  • D. sudo maglev install config update

Answer: A


NEW QUESTION # 150
An engineer configured a leak-map command to summarize EIGRP routes and advertise specifically loopback
0 with an IP of 10.1.1.1.255.255.255.252 along with the summary route. After finishing configuration, the customer complained not receiving summary route with specific loopback address. Which two configurations will fix it? (Choose two.)

  • A. Configure access-list 1 permit 10.1.1.1.0.0.0.252.
  • B. Configure access-list 1 and match under route-map Leak-Route.
  • C. Configure route-map Leak-Route permit 20.
  • D. Configure route-map Leak-Route permit 10 and match access-list 1.
  • E. Configure access-list 1 permit 10.1.1.0.0.0.0.3.

Answer: D,E

Explanation:
Explanation
When you configure an EIGRP summary route, all networks that fall within the range of your summary are suppressed and no longer advertised on the interface. Only the summary route is advertised. But if we want to advertise a network that has been suppressed along with the summary route then we can use leak-map feature. The below commands will fix the configuration in this question:
R1(config)#access-list 1 permit 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.3
R1(config)#route-map Leak-Route permit 10 // this command will also remove the "route_map Leak-Route deny 10" command.
R1(config-route-map)#match ip address 1


NEW QUESTION # 151
Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. A network administrator configured mutual redistribution on R1 and R2 routers, which caused instability in the network. Which action resolves the issue?

  • A. Set a tag in the route map when redistributing EIGRP into OSPF on R1. and match the same tag on R2 to deny when redistributing OSPF into EIGRP.
  • B. Advertise summary routes of EIGRP to OSPF and deny specific EIGRP routes when redistributing into OSPF.
  • C. Set a tag in the route map when redistributing EIGRP into OSPF on R1. and match the same tag on R2 to allow when redistributing OSPF into EIGRP.
  • D. Apply a prefix list of EIGRP network routes in OSPF domain on R1 to propagate back into the EIGRP routing domain.

Answer: A

Explanation:
When doing mutual redistribution at multiple points (between OSPF and EIGRP on R1 & R2), we may create routing loops so we should use route-map to prevent redistributed routes from redistributing again into the original domain.
In the below example, the route-map "SET-TAG" is used to prevent any routes that have been redistributed into EIGRP from redistributed again into OSPF domain by tagging these routes with tag 1:


NEW QUESTION # 152
......

300-410 Exam Dumps, 300-410 Practice Test Questions: https://www.guidetorrent.com/300-410-pdf-free-download.html

Free 300-410 Study Guides Exam Questions and Answer: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1foAz39u3mPZl5NOO5J9DTQbVfwaJMkoz